Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2429d10feb36bf7

Jump to content

Talk:Airspace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Squawkconspicuity in topic Merge proposal
[edit]

I'm confused as to why "The Mall" link text links to DC... isn't that the wrong way 'round? Or at any rate, it'd be a good idea to make it more transparent why the given text links to the given article... Alai 05:12, 29 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

SUA - really?

[edit]

Is there really SUA over Manhattan and Hollywood? I don't have the relevant charts but I checked online and couldn't see any. There may be TFRs popping up in those places, but a TFR isn't a SUA. Other well-known examples of P are Crawford and Kennebunkport. There are plenty of R's and MOAs around well-known installations, particularly military - can't we use those as an example? David Brooks 05:28, 29 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

I corrected the SUA definition but qualified my description as being just for the US - can someone who knows other jurisdictions can retouch as appropriate. The AIM also recognizes "Other Airspace Areas" - if we go an and talk about those, it needs to be made more clear that all SUA and OAA is also either Controlled or Uncontrolled. David Brooks 15:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
I think that the big problem was that there are really only two top level types of airspace: controlled or uncontrolled. Prohibited Areas, Restricted Areas and all manner of other SUA is a different concept to this. I've changed the article to reflect this, removing the definition of SUA (which is almost and article in its own right) and removed some assertions based on the US way of doing things that are incorrect from an international perspective.BaseTurnComplete 14:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Does anyone know the vertical limit of airspace? I.e how high do satellites need to be to avoid a violation of airspace?

Good question. I think the Karman line is what everyone just "goes with" and nobody makes a fuss about it, but there's no international agreement I can find. Could make things interesting in the future. FireLordAang (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Removed Reqdiagram tag

[edit]

Added a diagram to the main page of some special designations of airspace and removed tag.

Image

[edit]

The image is somewhat unclear. It would be helpful to add a caption explaining what each class is.--160.39.206.248 (talk) 19:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation needed

[edit]

Hi,

I added important information about the different airspace. My source is the FAA, in other words U.S. regulations. Although most countries use the same airspace rules and types I find it necessary to, somehow, disambiguate the topic stating something like: "the following airspace designation and rules are from the U.S. However, most countries have adapted this nomenclature making it somewhat universal".

Denis17.ranque (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airspace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Restructure and merge

[edit]

Hi, i'm currently restructuring this article and working on merging in Airspace class. Most of the content from there will be removed because it's uncited, burt the airspace class section could do with expansion if someone wants to pick out some things from that article at some point ✦ squawk conspicuity (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge. ✦ squawk conspicuity (talk) 13:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposing merge of Air sovereignty into Airspace. That article is a stub and covers topics that could be easily merged into the defense section here. ✦ squawk conspicuity (talk) 14:50, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.