Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ageroolithus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
A fact from Ageroolithus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 April2016(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Could someone check the thickness of the eggshells? The article currently states this is 25-36mm (i.e. at least 2.5cm / 1 inch thick), which seems remarkably thick for an eggshell. The cited source, ref 1, says "These eggshells are thicker than those of Megaloolithus aureliensis, and somewhat thinner than M. petralta from the type locality ( 1.12 mm to 2.09 mm; average 1.76 mm) or M. mamillare ( 1.2 to 2.2 mm, average 1.70 mm) from the Aix Basin." - so unless I'm missing something they're actually about 1mm thick, which sounds more reasonable...
87.115.231.155 (talk) 14:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply