Talk:After Laughter

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:After Laughter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Realmaxxver (talk · contribs) 12:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Adding comments soon. Realmaxxver (talk) 12:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

So, are you going to review this, @Realmaxxver:? It's been nearly a month now. MoonJet (talk) 04:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

• okay. Realmaxxver (talk) 12:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

  Thank you. Please do this as soon as you can. MoonJet (talk) 09:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

• "After Laughter represents a complete departure from the usual pop punk and alternative rock sound of their previous releases. The album touches on themes of exhaustion, depression and anxiety, in direct contrast to the upbeat and vibrant sound of the record." → "After Laughter represents a complete departure from the usual pop punk and alternative rock sound of their previous releases, while touching on themes of exhaustion, depression and anxiety, in direct contrast to the upbeat and vibrant sound of the record."
• ""Forgiveness" is a "dreamy power ballad" which features "sassy handclaps and hairflicks". It has been compared to pop rock bands Heart, Fleetwood Mac and Haim.[46][39]" → ""Forgiveness" is a "dreamy power ballad" which features "sassy handclaps and hairflicks", which has been compared to pop rock bands Heart, Fleetwood Mac and Haim.[46][39]"
• "According to NME, it is one of the album's nods to their punk past. They also compared it to No Doubt's earlier music.[46]" → "According to NME, it is one of the album's nods to their punk past, which they also compared to No Doubt's earlier music.[46]"

Copyvio

link

• wikidat is a mirror and fork, from what I can tell
• shorten down the quote in Society6 blog, AllMusic and maybe Paste magazine.

putting on hold for now. Realmaxxver (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

I've done the copy edit stuff. I'll check out the copyvio stuff later. MoonJet (talk) 15:47, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

@Realmaxxver: I've shortened the quotes from those first two sources. I don't think the Paste magazine quote needs to be shortened, as it only takes three sentences from the review. What do you mean about the Wikidat thing? I'm unfamiliar with this. Also, that link won't work for me. MoonJet (talk) 23:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Overall

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·