Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23499adee4f79f3

Jump to content

Talk:Afruca

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Cheetah131 in topic Peer Review

Update title to most current binomail name (Afruca tangeri).

[edit]

The title of this article needs updating from Uca tangeri to Afruca tangeri.

This change can be found in Shih, H. Te, Ng, P. K. L., Davie, P. J. F., Schubart, C. D., Türkay, M., Naderloo, R., & Jones, D. (2016). Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), Based on phylogenetic relationships, With a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, Sensu lato and its subgenera. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 64(July), 139–175.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeawilde (talkcontribs) 10:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Etymology of "Afruca" needed

[edit]

In order to help make this article more properly encyclopedic, we should add the etymology of the word "Afruca" (I guess it is Africa + uca). ~2025-37860-07 (talk) 13:45, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

We will need a good source. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why does it say "See also: Declawing of crabs"???

[edit]

Why does this article have the "See also" link Declawing of crabs"??? ~2025-37860-07 (talk) 13:47, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I’ve removed it. It seems only tangentially related. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:50, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

New Section Added

[edit]

I've added a new section on feeding and supported it with 2 journal sources. AsherHuK (talk) 06:17, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

[edit]

This article could use more information for each topic. It was a little repetitive at some points and the organization of the sections could have been a bit better. I edited for grammatical and structural errors. I also added a couple headers for subsections in the behavior section. And I took out some sentences that were repetitive and edited others to make the article flow better. G.suzannah (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

[edit]

Wikepedia stated that this article needed more links to other articles to embed it better into Wikepedia so I added a few links to other wikepedia articles. Furthermore, I removed some parentheses with information that could be subsitituted with links refrencing other Wikepedia articles. Cheetah131 (talk) 16:49, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply