Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23ba8ba4c1fc892

Jump to content

Talk:Aevum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2601:840:8783:FE40:896:50F4:75EF:E54 in topic "Dates back at least back to Albert" is incorrect

Seeking Assistance

[edit]

I am aware that this page, as it currently stands, is a fairly inadequate overview of the concept of aeviternity. It is intended simply as a means of getting the subject onto Wikipedia, so that people who have more expertise on the subject (and who possibly own their own copies of De quattuor coaequaevis) can come and flesh it out. If anybody reading this fits that description, please don't hesitate to come in and start rescuplting the page from the bottom up. -Agur bar Jacé (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I would question the academic worth of an almost unknown publisher as a qualified academic historian. It implies OR.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.9.109 (talk) 00:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Dates back at least back to Albert" is incorrect

[edit]

It's MORE correct to say that the concept of aeviternity dates back at least to Boethius. Source: Aquinas, Summa Theogica (I, q.10, a.5). By the way, no valid source was cited for the original claim. The fact that a source talks about Albert and aeviternity doesn't mean the concept originated with Albert. 2601:840:8783:FE40:896:50F4:75EF:E54 (talk) 15:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply