Talk:Aerial Reconfigurable Embedded System

250 nm?

The article refers to the combat range as 250 nanometers? Is this supposed to be 250 kilometers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.12.215.128 (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, corrected to Nautical Miles. TGCP (talk) 21:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

No picture

There isn't any image on the article. Should there be one? B-) (talk) 19:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

No vehicle has been made yet, nor prototypes. If a "free" image showing any potential vehicle can be found, I would say OK until an actual vehicle shows up. TGCP (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Cloud cuckoo land

There are far too many stumbling blocks for anything to come of this. The major one is safety. There will be no way of ensuring safety in the heat of battle. We know what trouble governments can get in now over safety, look at the BAE Systems Nimrod MRA4 debacle. I feel a common-sense caption whizzing DARPAs way very shortly.--Petebutt (talk) 04:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Ares disambiguation?

i feel like a vehicle both (A) being designed by the military and (B) having the same name as the Greek god of war is more than a coincidence. Original research/speculation, maybe, but Wikipedia also provides disambiguation links even when shared names are purely coincidental. Any objection to putting a note in the article? --71.121.143.10 (talk) 06:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Neither "Ares" nor "ARES" redirect here, so a hatnote is unnecessary, per WP:HATNOTE. - BilCat (talk) 06:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)