Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25c91844aa4dafe

Jump to content

Talk:Adventure Time: Side Quests

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Alex 21 in topic More than 20 episodes

More than 20 episodes

[edit]

Any source for more than 20 episodes? As in, the actual existance and confirmation of them, outside of just titles? -- Alex talk 09:27, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you mean aside from RT, yes. ScreenRant reported on the accidental early release of a few episodes, including episodes 24, 31, and 36, before the scheduled premiere. It even has a screenshot of the Hulu website where the episode numbers, titles, partial overviews, and thumbnails for the aforementioned episodes are shown as clear as day. Skeetacus25 (talk) 11:25, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
So, the sole source that has been provided is a leak? There's been no official confirmation of further episodes, either via primary or secondary sources? -- Alex talk 11:28, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
The leak itself not the source, the sources are Rotten Tomatoes and a ScreenRant article where they report on the episodes being made available by accident on Disney+ and Hulu in the US, which also shows that there are more than 20 episodes.
Unless reported by a reliable source, leaks should not normally be used or cited directly in articles. (WP:NEWSORG) Rotten Tomatoes doesn't report on the leaked episodes but they do have them clearly displayed as part of the series. ScreenRant does report on the leaked episodes and as stated in WP:VALNET: May be inappropriate to cite for controversial statements in BLP pages, but source is deemed reliable enough for other uses.
Do you want to add the ref or should I? Skeetacus25 (talk) 11:57, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
The leak is an unreliable event to report on, and is unreliable information. Neither source confirms that these are definitively further episodes. You are unable to provide any other source that details further episodes, unrelated to the leak. You've been fond of your walls of text when it comes to pulling up dozens of sources in the past; why are you unable to do so now? Why is there not a singular source available that explains that there are further episodes past this release? -- Alex talk 16:03, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply