Talk:Advaxis
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Rod57 in topic Is axalimogene filolisbac the same as ADXS-HPV
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]this article reads like PR. it should be revised to reflect the standards of a respectable encyclopedia.
- Yes, it's pretty poor right now. I've tried to do a little of this and I'll try to remember to come back and do some more. In the meantime, I've flagged it as having an advert-like tone (though it reads more like a press release to a medical journal) and perhaps another editor will come by with some improvments of their own. Astronaut (talk) 03:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]Can someone explain why various editors thought it necessary to create {{Advaxis}}, {{Infobox advaxis}} and {{Infobox Advaxis}} when the standard {{infobox company}} is more than adaquate for the job? Astronaut (talk) 04:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Is axalimogene filolisbac the same as ADXS-HPV
[edit]says "FDA halts Advaxis Phase 1/2 study of axalimogene filolisbac after patient death" - Is it the ADXS-HPV in the WP article ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:53, 14 March 2018 (UTC)