Talk:Adult standards

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why is "Adult Standards" capitalized throughout this article? I note that it's not capitalized in the title. Is it a proper noun? Why? -- Mikeblas 10:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lists

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've removed the links to individual radio stations from the external links. The second paragraph estimates 200 stations with this format, so we can't hope to list them all, and if we did they should be wikilinks.

Also, I think the list of artists is getting a bit too long, but I'm less sure how to handle that. — Electrolite 05:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

There are not 200 stations any more. In the 1960's there surely were.

Dominant music type in the United States mid 1930's - late 1960's Rarely heard currently

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BC77:4CC0:7D31:C63E:869E:CA1D (talk) 22:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC) Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Adult standards

Untitled

Lists