Talk:Adonizedek

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Melchizedek

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I feel this article should mention the apparent relationship between Melchizedek from Genesis 14 and Adonizedek in Jasher 16. Thoughts? Goodolclint 05:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is interesting that reading this part of the scripture in th bible (Joshua 10), I suddenly realize that striking resemblance with Melchizedek. I know that all mentions in the bible are not coincidental but rather their timings are effectively used for a message by God. Whether it was in error or intentional.

i think looking wt Adonizedek from the perspective of Melchizedek could yield something unique on this matter.

Why Adonizedek? Why now? And why Jerusalem? In the face of the principles of strongholds, could Jerusalem be holding the key to eternal spiritual triumph? 102.217.7.14 (talk) 03:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Jesus and the Battle of Siddim

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

While doing research on the character of Melchizedek, I found an unusual interpretation which asserts that Melchizedek and Jesus are the same person. Now, since Melchizedek is often believed to have fought at the Vale of Siddim, this view would practically lead us to think that Jesus himself fought in that battle. ADM (talk) 15:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Adonizedek

Melchizedek

Jesus and the Battle of Siddim