Talk:Adobe InCopy
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]In addition to the main benefit mentioned in the article, many organizations benefit from InCopy solutions because they provide editors with a way to edit text on a page while preventing them from changing the appearance and geometry of the page and it's text frames, picture boxes, etc.
It isn't listed as part of the Adobe Creative Suite. Is it automatically included as part of the InDesign?...
"Another key feature"... "another key feature". This article is not very well written. Don't use the exact same phrase for two sentences in a row. --Aughtandzero 07:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
screenshot
[edit]image is of CS2 while CS5 is released?
Incopy is also a separate product
--Umar1996 (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
updated screenshot --Umar1996 (talk) 09:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
InCopy CC isi now part of the Creative Cloud subscription.
[edit]I just bought a subscription and installed everything. Could someone please update the article to show this?173.58.96.84 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Still too much of the article is taken up by the Middle Eastern info
[edit]The last post was wiki-nazi-ed out of existence by Lisa. The bulk of this article is stuff on the Middle Eastern port. If the rest of the article has too little information about the main subject it sure doesn't need to have it made up for by listing one particular localization. Especially in the English version of Wikipedia. Are there extensive space-fillers about English conversions on the other-language product pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.32.193.80 (talk) 16:41, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Last time I checked, what Nazi's did to occupied Europe was either turning it into a rubble or messing it up good. That's what you did to the article (mess deletion) and this talk page (making a mess). It was Nazi opinion to eradicate people who were deemed unnecessary. Again, this is what you are advocating here.
- Wikipedia is not censored; if you don't like something, it doesn't mean you can remove it. Wikipedia is a work in progress. If the other aspects of the program is not covered, that is because no one has yet got around to do it.
- Concerned,
- Codename Lisa (talk) 01:40, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Not Nazi... Wiki-Nazi http://wikiality.wikia.com/Wikinazi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.32.193.80 (talk) 01:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)