Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23fdd791ecfaea1

Jump to content

Talk:Adam Smith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Thincat in topic Referent of the pronoun his
Former good article nomineeAdam Smith was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2008WikiProject peer reviewCollaborated
June 15, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 13, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
March 10, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
February 13, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 16, 2017.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Political Thought

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2025 and 9 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ferdinand taylor (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Guinnesswasmydog (talk) 21:26, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Referent of the pronoun his

[edit]

Reading the phrase “his two surviving children”, following the name Smith (under Death), I searched the whole article for some information on his children. (He could have had children without being married.) Because I didn’t find any, I went back to understand that the referent of “his” was Douglas, not Smith. Am I right to find this ambiguous, disturbing? If others agree, I leave it to them to improve, because English is not my first language. Dominique Meeùs (talk) 12:06, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I've seen to it, uncertain whether to put Douglas' or Douglas's, (or maybe Reston's). But I'm English so no one expects me to know! Thincat (talk) 18:32, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply