Talk:Access Fund
Add topicLatest comment: 4 months ago by Aszx5000 in topic Requested move 18 March 2026
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 18 March 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) Aszx5000 (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
The Access Fund → ? – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Igavvedit (talk) 06:53, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to propose moving this page to "Access Fund" as that is how it is used by the organization itself (a short browse of their website will confirm there is no usage of the phrase "The Access Fund," rather it is consistently stylized as "Access Fund." Other reliable sources within the climbing community such as this magazine also refer to it as "Access Fund." Wikipedia naming convention WP:NCTHE also states to not use in/definite articles in the naming. Igavvedit (talk) 06:53, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
- I would just makes this move as their website clearly uses "Access Fund" and not "The Access Fund". Perhaps it was different historically, but their name is now "Access Fund". I would just WP:BOLDly do this move now. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 09:55, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.