Talk:Abort67

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Abortion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bias in Article

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article as it currently stands is consistently biased in favour of Abort67's views and actions.

It's worth noting that the majority of this article was written by an account named "Abort67", suggesting that they have written their own article. Havell (talk) 13:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Response to claims of bias from Abort67

When the article was written by someone who wasn't from Abort67 (and therefore unaware of what we are about) it was biased against us - using pro-abortion leaning media to support claims. If we were dishonest then we could have used a pseudonym. The fact that we dispute the allegations and have backed it up with documented evidence (court case) removes the plausibility of your "bias" claim. If you disagree still, then please be more specific about which points you believe to be bias as opposed to irrefutably vague comments.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Abort67

Bias in Article

Response to claims of bias from Abort67