Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22afb1a9a2e1709

Jump to content

Talk:Abeed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 184.147.211.109 in topic Who is Meyer?

Brackets

[edit]

Should there be brackets in this sentence?

Meyer dismisses this as "efforts by propagandists [to] explain the term away [that are] at the least, disingenuous".[1] Robert (talk) 17:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

C20 usage,

[edit]

Middle-eastern Arabs, and particularly Lebanese, contemptuously apply the term to all peoples west of the Suez. Egyptians are seen as traitors to the Arab cause.61.68.167.244 (talk) 21:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


Citation

[edit]

The entire paragraph:

However, the derogatory abuse of the word does not negate its original meaning or spiritual implications. Linguistically, the word Abid (Abed) is from the Semitic languages. In Hebrew, the name Obed means "servant" or "worshiper," and the Arabic word abd, abid, or abīd (often written without a vowel in translation) means "slave" and has been applied to a Muslim as a "slave or worshiper of God (Allah)." The implication that a Muslim should strive to be a "completely devout servant of God" is based upon Quranic verses that state that Muhammad, even as God's messenger, was simply a Abid (i.e. a slave or servant) of God. This usage of the term was implied from Islam's inception in 600 AD and precedes the derogatory use of the term in the Sudanese conflict of the 20th century.

Is rather entertaining given the lack of any reference and the preceding text:

Meyer dismisses this as "efforts by propagandists [to] explain the term away [that are] at the least, disingenuous"

Which actually has a reference.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.177.161.91 (talk) 15:11, 22 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Totally agree! A huge body of text without any sources whatsoever! I am deleting that nonsense.Tamsier (talk) 21:51, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Who is Meyer?

[edit]

The second sentence begins "Meyer dismisses ... " but who is Meyer and why is he or she being referenced there?184.147.211.109 (talk) 06:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply