Talk:ASUS ProArt

How to improve this article

Dear editors,

After several attempts and revisions, the article is still considered to contain promotional and LLM-generated content. I am genuinely unsure how to better meet Wikipedia's neutral point of view requirements. Could you kindly provide more specific guidance on how to improve the article ? For example, which sentences should be adjusted or rewritten?

Many thanks for your patience and advice. I am committed to contributing in a correct, neutral and fully compliant manner.

Tech Savvy User (talk) 02:36, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Merge into ASUS

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Along with ASUS ROG and ASUS TUF, I think the page should be integrated into ASUS one, especially considering it's a lesser-known product line than ROG and TUF. So if they don't have a separate page, I don't see why ProArt should. Paranoid25 (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I’ve seen that both ASUS's brand positioning and coverage by tech media treat ASUS ProArt as a sub-brand. This is similar to how they view ASUS ROG and ASUS TUF, which focus on solutions for creators. A recent article by Republic World highlights this viewpoint. I also noticed that Lenovo Legion and Lenovo LOQ each have their own dedicated pages. Given this, I think the ProArt page should also stand alone. Rifeh1991 (talk) 09:27, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm saying that if ROG and TUF don't have separate pages, ProArt shouldn't have one either. Paranoid25 (talk) 10:58, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

While it's true that ASUS ROG and ASUS TUF do not have separate pages, Wikipedia usually looks at topics based on their importance and independent coverage. This is more important than whether related product lines have their own pages. Several tech media outlets have described ASUS ProArt as a brand aimed at creators. It includes a wider range of products such as laptops, displays, motherboards, and workstations for creative professionals. Considering this coverage and its unique position, a separate page for ProArt seems reasonable. Rifeh1991 (talk) 02:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Then there are two choices:

• Create pages also for ASUS ROG and ASUS TUF
• Or merge ASUS ProArt into ASUS

We have to wait for other opinions from the community. Paranoid25 (talk) 09:02, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

See WP:ALLORNOTHING. Notability applies on an individual case-by-case basis, not to a group of related subjects. — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, but I was simply making a comparison between the various ASUS brands: ROG and TUF are more well-known than ProArt, and it was decided to keep them on the ASUS page. Paranoid25 (talk) 08:21, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

well that was all of nothing. ~2026-20951-59 (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Just because one thing is more well-known than another thing doesn't mean that there's more to write about it or that it received more media coverage by reliable sources. And if it did in this case, feel free to write articles about Asus ROG and Asus TUF. If the articles are long enough and enough media coverage is demonstrated in the form of reliable sources, chances are they will be kept separate. Maxeto0910 (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

I believe this page should stand alone, as it allows for more detail than it being put with all the ASUS stuff. Tylerstechwiki (talk) 21:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

I suspect your account is a @Rifeh1991 sockpuppet... Paranoid25 (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Paranoid25, if you have evidence of this, you should post it at WP:SPI#How to open an investigation. If you don't have evidence, then it's inappropriate to make an accusation. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Oppose merge. It would bloat the Asus article too much, at least when we want to retain the depth and level of detail of this article. Asus's other subbrands, such as Asus ROG and Asus TUF, may deserve separate articles as well when enough media coverage is demonstrated in the form of reliable sources, but, well, other stuff exists. Maxeto0910 (talk) 22:46, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Oppose merge per Wikipedia:NOMERGE. As Maxeto has already said, the resulting article would be too long, and this article has a considerable amount of content on its own that would deserve a standalone page. BlaqWiedow (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.