Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23d8d93b97f2407

Jump to content

Talk:ASL Valkyrie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by MilborneOne in topic Name

Military

[edit]

A report in the times quotes Barber in saying that he had presented three machines to the government, two with engines and the one flown by Cammell without. The article says four, although he could have given another one later! MilborneOne (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Like most things, the records seem to be sketchy. Probably Samson was put off the things by Cammell's death. I'm sure I've a cite for him offering four. I also seem to remember that they were all airframe-only, but that at least one of the ones Samson struck off charge had an engine. and I would imagine that they were tricky to fly and would certainly hae and flight charteristics unlike anyhing else they had Incidentally W.T. Busk got his brevet in a Valkrie (maybe why he was so interested in inherent stability), one of the last to do so, I'm probably going to put the Valkyrie as a see also in the Aerial Wheel article. Benson sounds like a loss to the world of aviation, poor boy.TheLongTone (talk) 22:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

...A reference added for four machines, infuriatingly referrd to as "Military type" Valkyries.TheLongTone (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Name

[edit]

Would it be better to use the name ASL Valkyrie monoplanes (format as used in ASL Viking) the current title is an unlikely search term with the full stop and abbreviated Ltd. Thought? MilborneOne (talk) 08:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Makes sense to me.GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Agree entirely, mea culpaTheLongTone (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Moved, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 12:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply