Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a40374b76bc44b67

Jump to content

Talk:AI scribe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Bondegezou in topic Possible AI generated writing

Removing Heidi Health "audit" case study

[edit]

I am disclosing a WP:COI as an employee of Heidi Health. I am removing the specific mention of a "Heidi Health 2026 Audit" from the "Adoption and Challenges" section for the following reasons:

1. Undue Weight (WP:WEIGHT): Even if the cited audit existed, using one specific company’s unverified security claim as a general industry "case study" violates neutral point of view standards.

2. Verifiability (WP:V): The audit mentioned is a "ghost source" with no public record. It appears to be part of a coordinated smear campaign currently being investigated under WP:SPI.

3. Narrative Laundering: This text was inserted by User:Ryesaid0004 immediately after identical text was added to the Heidi Health brand page. This suggests an attempt to "launder" a brand-specific dispute into a broader industry narrative.

For the integrity of this general industry article, specific brand disputes without high-quality secondary sourcing should be avoided. M.A.Wiki 26 (talk) 02:10, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dealt with here Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Request_for_Revision_Deletion:_Grossly_defamatory/unsourced_claims_(Heidi_Health). Polygnotus (talk) 03:50, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Possible AI generated writing

[edit]

Concerns were raised previously about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged; however, note that fixing the issue requires more than just removing the superficial signs. Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article is a bit of a mess. There's some content that looks LLM-generated. There's a lot of content that's a bit POVy, quite a lot of unbalanced criticism. There are some less ideal citations. I've boldly gone in and re-titled the article and re-arranged stuff. I'm re-writing various bits of text. Depending how far I get, that may remove any concerns over AI-generated content. Happy for others to join in, of course! Bondegezou (talk) 09:19, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply