Talk:ADS 48

ADS 48 F

Recently i made a heavy cut on the article to remove every single optical companion (it was once mentioned as a seven-star system!), but there is some tension at ADS 48 F, which @SevenSpheres re-added on the basis that the article was originally about it and it still redirects here, although this was before only ADS 48 A and B were determined to form a binary system. While we can't just shoehorn it on this article, as it is not part of the gravitationally bound system, component F should have its own article, as it is notable enough for this, perhaps at Gliese 2? 21 Andromedae (talk) 17:54, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Is Gliese 2 notable enough for its own article? I don't see sources that discuss it individually, only as part of the ADS 48 system. The stars are close in space and have common proper motion, it's not like it's a random background or foreground star. Maybe it could be split out to its own section & starbox? SevenSpheres (talk) 18:29, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

This is also a good idea, specially considering some articles do it, e.g. Alpheratz#Optical companion. If ADS 48 F can't have its own article, we can write about it here. 21 Andromedae (talk) 18:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

WP:NASTRO says: The object has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, which contain significant commentary on the object. Those certainly contain something that is significant about this star, so it can be created. By the way, i already created it. 21 Andromedae (talk) 23:41, 5 August 2025 (UTC)