Talk:9S

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:9S (Nier: Automata)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 03:11, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 23:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

I will be reviewing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 23:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Nominating author is the top user in authorship. Subject is notable, based on what I find in Google, Google News, Google Books, Google Scholar, Internet Archive Scholar, JSTOR, Project MUSE, and EBSCO. The prose is neutral and stable, and there are no ongoing edit wars. The references layout appears correct according to MOS:NOTES. There appear to be no copyright violations or plagiarism. I see -our endings and -ize endings, and it looks like you may be using Canadian English or Oxford spelling. The article uses MDY dates, so Oxford spelling is incompatible. Canadian English and MDY dates are compatible. If we are going to use Canadian English in this article, this article appears well-written. Images are appropriate for the article. The non-free image has a valid non-free use rationale. A more detailed review may be forthcoming. Z. Patterson (talk) 00:39, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I have some points to address.

• I do not see a specific mention of Yui Ishikawa in the Animate article cited (reference number 21), unless you are also pointing to reference number 22, where I see her name appear in the article.

• • Removed

• Please make sure citations are filled out correctly. For example, a citation for Polygon is currently formatted in the article as follows: {cite web|url=https://www.polygon.com/2019/11/14/20950641/best-of-the-decade-game-spoilers-god-of-war-three-houses-persona-odyssey-bioshock-portal-doki-nier|title=The best game spoilers of the decade|website=Complex|date=November 14, 2019|access-date=August 13, 2024|archive-date=October 1, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001012436/https://www.polygon.com/2019/11/14/20950641/best-of-the-decade-game-spoilers-god-of-war-three-houses-persona-odyssey-bioshock-portal-doki-nier|url-status=live}}

• • Revised

• Could you try to reduce some of the reliance on the quotes in the Reception section?

• • Reworded.

• The word "liked" can come across as unencyclopedic. Perhaps a better term could fit.

• • Revised.

Otherwise, the article appears to be done well. I will give you seven days to address these issues. Z. Patterson (talk) 03:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

@Z. Patterson: Thanks for the review. I tried fixing all the issues you pointed but I can't find a Wikipedia article to link black and white moralities unless it's just a common phrase.Tintor2 (talk) 03:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.