Talk:764 (organization)

Can we just delete the whole list?

Continuing discussion above. It's a magnet for poorly verified incidents, BLPCRIME violations, and stating criminal allegations as fact, and the list format is a mess. The amount of these that are actually verified is vanishingly slim. It's also been tagged with an unfixable maintenance tag for a year. I don't see what a listing of every single minor criminal adds to the rest of the article. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:30, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I'd be in favor of this, as stated before I don't see how a detailed list/directory of every mentioned incident involving 764 is encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not news or everything after all. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 10:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

I would be in favor of this generally except that there have been a trail of crimes linked to this group including school shootings which I think does make the list notable? I think part of the issue with this group is they exist mostly online and embedded in Discord and Roblox servers etc so their actions as a whole can be sort diffuse and appear to not fit a clear pattern. But because they are an accelerationist group many of their tactics are intended to be erratic which is also why I think the list is necessary. [] Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:41, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Why exactly is a catalog of every reported incident involving 764 encyclopedic content? An encyclopedia's job is to provide a summary of a subject, not to catalog every detail. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 02:59, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

I would be open to compiling into a more succinct paragraph or paragraphs. I do not think it needs to be in list form per say but I do think maintaining of certain notable incidents--or collections of incidents ie grouping them together by type is important for giving a reader a broader picture of what this group is and does. Agnieszka653 (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

I don't think any particular incident is notable. And what they did was sextortion, which is explained plenty in text. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:29, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

That's not true. They have also been involved in school shootings as well: []. Agnieszka653 (talk) 04:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Nowhere in the article does it say that. 764 being mentioned as one of many dark online communities alongside school shootings is not a link. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:42, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

764 is part of COM and No Lives Matter--yes they have been involved in goading on school shootings: "Solomon Henderson, a Tennessee teenager whom police said shot up his high school last month, posted a sprawling manifesto that referenced both mass shooters inspired by Terrorgram as well as homicidal 764 members, including Tobbz. Henderson’s social media accounts also show extensive imagery from 764’s channels as well as the Order of Nine Angles “The influence I see most heavily in that agenda is the Order of Nine Angles,” Molas says." [] Agnieszka653 (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Referencing somebody and stealing their imagery is not being part of a group, and the ONA is a different thing. NLM is also difefrent but related - we cannot conflate these differently described things, that is OR. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:17, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

It was my understanding that 764 is a subgroup of ONA. And apologies what is OR shorthand for? Agnieszka653 (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

That is a common misconception spread by earlier, inaccurate coverage. There is a lot of bad, sensationalized coverage of this subject that is not RS. They are not "subgroups" - people in these spheres online sometimes overlap but they are distinct things.

WP:Original research. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:54, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

What does the list add? PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:02, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

I've been trying to clean it up a little, and just found this discussion. I stripped away the ones without convictions, but most of them are still more minor. I think the references Henderson made are more appropriate being mentioned in the antioch article. I'm certainly up for getting rid of it. ⚠︎ ArkadenBoden ⚠︎ (talk) 15:34, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 May 2026

Add United States of America to the countries that classify 764 as a terrorist group Goofer0966 (talk) 02:55, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

No, because it did not. The United States has no domestic terrorist designation system, only foreign terrorism. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Quebec man faces terrorism charges tied to 764 extremist network

Worth Adding this to the page or no? Article is from the CBC: [] Agnieszka653 (talk) 01:43, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

WP:BLPCRIME, not convicted, so no. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:45, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 June 2026

add not to be confused with hatnote and add The Com in see also ~2026-33914-63 (talk) 02:30, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

not to be confused with 764 or 764 (number) ~2026-33914-63 (talk) 02:31, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done, instead I added 764 disambiguation to the hatnote. The Com is already linked in the article, so no need for See Also. guninvalid (talk) 02:52, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Suggested Edit For 2026 Incidents

ALBANY — The instructions Aaron Corey allegedly sent in his letter last month were very specific, naming two FBI agents and a federal prosecutor he wanted dead — and the “fun part,” how he wanted them killed. According to the complaint, Corey also professes he goes by the nickname “Baggeth” and is a member of the cybergroup “764,” which the FBI describes as an online extremist network targeting and exploiting children. - https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/fbi-charges-albany-man-wood-chipper-based-22328453.php [[Special:Contributions/

Official Arrest Complaint: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndny/media/1450431/dl?inline

~2026-37811-23|~2026-37811-23]] (talk) 21:29, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

We don't do "alleged" incidents for BLP reasons. And also for WP:UNDUE reasons. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:37, 1 July 2026 (UTC)