Talk:7-bone roast

Merge proposal

Superbeecat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has proposed merging the article 7-Bone Steak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) into this article. Please discuss this here

• Support Two stubs about the same cut of meat. - Jeremy (Jerem43 08:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC))

• Both articles are stubs and could also potentially be merged into Chuck steak, couldn't they? - 198.199.136.65 (talk) 04:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

• I agree. Each cut should be given an article of it's own, and it's uses listed within that article. Roast and Steak are functionally the same thing. It doesn't make sense to repeat the information about each cut for each culinary application. Dasai Montale (talk) 23:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

• Support as they reference the same cut of beef.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Do not support

While this may technically be the same piece of meat, it has to separate and distinct uses. I could support the merge if we titled the new page “7-bone chuck roast/steak” Patchogue 01:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

That doesn't make any sense. Then every single cut of meat would have to have have roast/steak, as every steak is simply a slice of a roast. An article on steak should make the distinction, but naming every article roast/steak is just silly - superβεεcat  02:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Who said anything about naming every article that way?Patchogue (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)