Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a220d3415e01cac0

Jump to content

Talk:486

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by 125.236.211.165 in topic [Untitled]

[Untitled]

[edit]
Languege Template of Japanese Link is Missing. An error linkd ja:486, and correct link right ja:Intel 486. --61.125.222.70 (talk) 12:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
There's no error. The Japanese Interwiki link is there, just before the Nnapulitano link (nap:) and it links correctly. Since this article is about the year AD 486 (ten years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire), it should not link to the japanese article about the computer processor. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 14:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
THANKS your talk. I am sorry, its mistaken idea.--61.125.222.70 (talk) 06:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

this page is horrible and linking to this page is a horrible mash of automated data-linking, and real linking meaning to go to the processor.


whoever made the templete boxes relys on these articles being simply a number,


why should any random number automatically referrer to a year?? this is nutty.Scientus (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


I too came looking for information about THE 486, not information about some long-past year with a one-sentence stub of an article where Romans interact with Gaul in some historic footnote. Not that I think that there should be no article about whatever happened in 486 - just adding my voice to the chorus - why can't it be at least a disambiguation page by default? Maybe the template boxes referred to by Scientus could be rewritten? 125.236.211.165 (talk) 03:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply