Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23853c50abeeddd

Jump to content

Talk:36 Cube

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by R c a d in topic Solution?

Untitled

[edit]

Via computer search I have determined that there are 96 unique mechanical solutions to this puzzle. Of course, there is a mechanical trick that allows solutions to the puzzle violate the rules of the 36 officer problem but still appear solved. Bmenrigh (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Solution?

[edit]

Shouldn't a Wiki article on a solvable puzzle contain at least one sample solution to the puzzle? This seems to be the standard with other puzzles like the "8 queens" puzzle. In the case of a commercial product like the 36 cube, perhaps the article could contain a link to the (or a) solution, with an appropriate "spoiler" warning? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.206.187.121 (talk) 05:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

It is clearly unsolvable, as it has all restrictions of the unsolvable Thirty-six officers problem (plus some more). This was already corrected once, why did it re-appear? Before checking here I also wrote a code to solve it which also rendered it unsolvable — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.63.124.182 (talk) 14:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is not unsolvable, because there are two special pieces which fit differently onto some parts of the base from other pieces of the same height. There are 96 possible solutions - verified by an exhaustive computer search. I have one of them sitting in front of me right now.  Preceding unsigned comment added by R c a d (talkcontribs) 14:57, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply