Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport
This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.
Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Why do these reports consistently say "+1 lap" for lapped drivers? Where it’s given as +29.182, for example, that’s where a driver has taken an additional 29 seconds to reach the finish. That’s more time than the winner. "+1 lap" would seem to indicate a driver who has done one more lap than the winner, which is clearly nonsense. The correct indicator would be "-1 lap": 78 minus 1 is 77....
I do know that wikipedia isn’t the only place where this occurs. 84.67.37.223 (talk) 10:48, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
The logic here is that +29.182 means that the driver was 29.182 seconds behind the first at the finish. So +1 lap means they were 1 lap behind the leader. SSSB (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
There are various sources where -1 lap is used, and it should be consistently picked up in other places. +29 is because they have taken 29 additional seconds to complete the race; -1 lap is where someone has done a lap fewer... 84.67.37.223 (talk) 14:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Don't act as though your way is the only correct way. You are coming across as arrogant and self centred. As I explained, it explains how far behind they are, not how much longer it took. So in that sense +1 lap is completely correct. -1 lap is completely correct if you think about it the way you describe. Both are correct from different perspectives. SSSB (talk) 14:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Gosh, I really seem to have upset someone here, and I don't know quite why. Is there really a need for this judgmental response? I think I am within my rights to think of my approach as correct, and if someone were to say "I don't agree" I wouldn't really be able to challenge that. I just wonder if there is any cause for Wikipedia to review its conventions for how race result gaps are presented. 84.67.37.223 (talk) 13:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply