Talk:2020

Scheduled event (July 17 - Planned launch of NASA's Mars 2020 mission) contradicts with cited source

On NASA's website it is said that the launch window is scheduled between July the 22th and August the 11th, yet on Scheduled it is written that the launch is scheduled for July the 17th. I want to fix that, but I don't know if the launch window should be written on there or a single date, since every other event on that article is a single date.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2101 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2067 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:05, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 18 April 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

---

2020 → 2020 (year)2020 (year) – There’s ton of shit called 2020, people could be searching for the film 2020 and literally other things 2020, so therefore 2020 (year) should be the title, the number 2020 should not be the primary topic for the year. ~2026-23907-63 (talk) 09:38, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• The year is probably primary by long-term significance. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:58, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

I think this might be the same RM spammer from late last year… 1isall (talk | contribs) 10:52, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose the year has 14,969 views but the Bon Jovi album only has 2,088[]. The year is clearly primary by long-term significance given the number doesn't have a separate article. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:30, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose for consistency. No other year article contains disambiguation in the title. Skitash (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose Nothing else is nearly as primary as the year. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:32, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.