Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2018 Sukma attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I've restored the article as there seems to be some confusion as to how we're supposed to treat this situation. Reverting and deleting creations by sockpuppets is allowed, but that doesn't mean "mandatory". If a user in good standing restores a sock's edits, taking responsibility for them and making them their own, as Samee did here and reemphasized here, then you can't revert them as a sock. Unilateral redirection (as an exercise of CSD G5) is not valid once a non-sock restores the content with their endorsement, and would then constitute an out of process deletion of content added by an established editor in good standing. Please do not restore the redirect without taking this to AfD. Swarm♠02:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Swarm: I have nominated. Consider adding this sentence on main page:-
{{Article for deletion/dated|page=2018 Sukma attack|timestamp=|year=2018|month=March|day=26|substed=yes|help=off}}
Capitals00 (talk) 05:56, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:21, 26 March 2018 (UTC)