Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a463b5361f9acf74

Jump to content

Talk:2016 NRL Grand Final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

ANZ Stadium is a neutral venue for the NRL Grand final - aka no 'home' rights

[edit]

Just to put it out there, there are no 'hosting rights' or 'home rights' when it comes to the NRL Grand Final. Despite its location, the chosen venue for the match is considered a 'neutral ground'. This is due to a contractual agreement between the NRL and the NSW government, not any of the Sydney clubs. The Cronulla Sharks do not represent NSW, or even Sydney for that matter, and do not play their home games at the venue (they use Allianz Stadium during the finals). As such, there are no home rights to the NRL Grand Final. The team that is listed first is due to them having finished higher on the premiership ladder. Narconarco1 (talk) 11:41, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

That all sounds very reasoned and I'm inclined to agree. But perhaps User:CodyCruickshank's concern is consistency. Has the higher-finishing team always been listed in Grand final articles first? Is the above interpretation going to mean going back and making a lot of changes to previous grand final articles? If so, it should give us pause. If other GF articles do already list the higher-finishing teams first, then I'd say User:Narconarco1 has it right and we can get on with being productive. (I'm sure this doesn't need saying, but please nobody see this as an inducement to start edit-warring on other grand final articles. Let's stick to discussion for the time being.)--Gibson Flying V (talk) 14:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
See []. On the NRL homepage Melbourne is listed first.--Je suis blocked by Darkwind 16:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Also agree, neutral venue, higher team first. After all, had Canberra won their QF, the PF would be been their "home" game without question - but at the SFS.
There will be a designated home team, for things like coin toss etc - but I can't find the relevant rulebook. For now I would list Melbourne first, based on and (they took the top path). However I would expect at least one reliable source to mention the designated home team this in the upcoming week, so if one arises then feel free to change the article based on that. Mattlore (talk) 21:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
There has been one anomaly in the past being the 2008 NRL Grand Final. Manly were listed first and wore their home strip during the match despite finishing 2nd on the ladder whilst Melbourne were minor premiers. This is perhaps due to the fact that Manly performed better then Melbourne during the finals series. Narconarco1 (talk) 00:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
I suspect it is explained by 2008_NRL_season#Finals_Chart and has nothing to do with where they finished on the ladder. Mattlore (talk) 01:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Prose for the match summary

[edit]

I have started expanding the match summary. Please feel free to add to it. This article could be on the Wikipedia front page if this section is improved. Jarumain (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:NRL Grand Final which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply