Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24e4ff2adf73488

Jump to content

Talk:2014 FE72

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 months ago by 2A00:23C8:9C94:DD01:859:4F80:1BAB:E51C in topic Heliocentric gone wild

Heliocentric gone wild

[edit]

Note to myself: Heliocentric aphelion (Q) range: AD= 2.37 (epoch 1960-Oct-01) to AD= 5.23 (epoch 1979-Jan-01) * 10^3. Barycentric varies only from Q (AD) = (2.95 to 2.97) * 10^3. Barycentric solution much more stable over different epochs. -- Kheider (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Trivia: 14FE72 passed 24AU from Uranus around 1950. (Horizons "Observer Location: @Uranus") -- Kheider (talk) 07:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

...what does any of this mean?
(I ask because having the heliocentric aphelion and SMA would be useful for comparing against the other extreme TNOs, whose own measurements are given as a bit of a random mix of helio and barycentric... and having read the above I feel even more lost. What's all the "AD" stuff? Are the formulas meant to imply 2370 to 5230AU and 2950 to 2970AU, or am I guessing wrong?) 2A00:23C8:9C94:DD01:859:4F80:1BAB:E51C (talk) 23:02, 14 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
(...but then, the barycentric SMA given on the article is 2045AU, so... erm?) 2A00:23C8:9C94:DD01:859:4F80:1BAB:E51C (talk) 23:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)Reply