Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a276132c8e50c6f8

Jump to content

Talk:2010 Asian Games

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Bgsu98 in topic GA Reassessment
Good article2010 Asian Games has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 12, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 8, 2023Good article reassessmentKept
February 28, 2026Good article reassessmentKept
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on November 12, 2010.
Current status: Good article

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 Asian Games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2010 Asian Games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Withdrawn: No copy edit template now. The person who loves reading (talk) 04:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

This article has a copy edit template, which means that there are a lot of grammar mistakes in this article. The person who loves reading (talk) 04:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The copy edit template was removed from the article later on April 4; there had been work by editors leading up to that point. The person who loves reading, do you have specific issues with the article as it stands now? When requesting reassessment, it helps to check the article yourself and identify specific issues rather than relying only on a possibly outdated template. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article review

[edit]

I see that this article was recently at GAR: it seems like the main reason at that time was because the article needed a copyedit. After reviewing this article, I see lots of uncited statements, especially about the mascots and closing ceremonies, which I think need to be resolved for this article to keep its GA status. Should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Issues appear to have been resolved. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:50, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

In its 2023 GAR, the reassessment addressed copyediting concerns. Looking at the article now, there are still lots of uncited statements to be resolved. Z1720 (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.