Talk:2009
Add topicLatest comment: 4 months ago by ~2026-17576-02 in topic Shall we stop recognizing this year as a part of the 2000s already?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 May 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Shall we stop recognizing this year as a part of the 2000s already?
[edit]This year has a lot in common with the following decade than it did to the 2000s. It seems so wrong to group a post-smartphone, post-social media boom year with the other that lacked these (year 2000). I used to always believe 2009 was a part of that decade at first, thanks to popular culture and technology from the year for helping me seek truth and stopped me from believing those lies and arbitrary groupings. If anyone really remembers what was going on then and the 2000s decade, they should not think 2009 is "2000s". ~2026-17576-02 (talk) 09:31, 21 March 2026 (UTC)