Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23f35339f33b5b3

Jump to content

Talk:2006 AFL draft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by JeffGBot in topic Dead link

Untitled

[edit]

Who updates this? theyve done well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.28.135.246 (talkcontribs) 20:09, 26 November 2006.

Dates

[edit]

It does not make sense to include the pre-season draft taking place before the 2006 season on the same page as trades and the national draft occurring after the 2006 season. The only reason to validate doing this is a pedantic adhesion to dates specified by the AFL.

I suggest that drafts be re-organised by off-seasons, so that each preseason draft is matched with the national draft from its offseason. This would make more sense to fans. The pages could be renamed, for example, the 2006/07 AFL Draft, and then the correct names given by the AFL, e.g. 2006 NAB AFL National Draft, would be used as sub-headings.

I just wanted to discuss this to see if there was any particular reason why the drafts are organised as they currently are. Aspirex 10:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think you would be better to raise your point at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject AFL to reach the broader AFL-focussed group as not everyone has each Draft article on their Watchlist. Pudgey 20:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply