Talk:19 Keys
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Butlerblog in topic 19Keys is a famous influencer.
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
19Keys is a famous influencer.
[edit]Hello, I’m CTO for 19Keys, a famous public speaker and teacher who travels the world and sells out tours globally. His image is being used for this page and is misleading. We would like a page for 19keys who has 100s of millions of views collectively across social media platforms. Thehueman (talk) 15:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Thehueman: If that's the case, then you have a clear conflict of interest in editing this article. Please refer to WP:COI for our policies. Content in the articles require a reliable source, and what you're changing is presently unsourced (and thus has been reverted). If you would like to provide reliable sources for updating the article, please comment on the talk page here rather than editing the article yourself (since you have a self-declared CoI). Please refer to WP:RS for what we consider to be reliable and how things need to be cited. Anything that doesn't fall under what we consider to be a reliable source is not going to be used (and thus requested changes without a source will be denied). ButlerBlog (talk) 16:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- A search on any platform validates what I’m saying.. you are using the image of my client and have been to promote this show. How is that sourced? We have proof this has gone on all year and nobody will allow us to create a page. This is clear discrimination and we will take action if we must. Nowhere does your policy say you can use our image and we cannot create a page for our client. Thehueman (talk) 16:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Thehueman: RE: your statement "
we will take action if we must.
" Let me advise you to stop right there. Read the policy I linked for you. We take a dim view of legal threats (see: WP:LEGAL) and what I quoted you as saying could be perceived as such. A legal threat is grounds for immediate blocking. I'll assume your comment was not intended that way and that you, as a new editor, are unaware of the policy. However, now that you are, take it to heart in your communication here. ButlerBlog (talk) 16:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Thehueman: RE: your statement "
- A search on any platform validates what I’m saying.. you are using the image of my client and have been to promote this show. How is that sourced? We have proof this has gone on all year and nobody will allow us to create a page. This is clear discrimination and we will take action if we must. Nowhere does your policy say you can use our image and we cannot create a page for our client. Thehueman (talk) 16:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)