Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26c679f3a6d2407

Jump to content

Talk:1999 Saskatchewan general election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 years ago by CJCurrie in topic Untitled

Untitled

[edit]

You don't remember the Channel Lake hearings in the Legislature's Crown Corporations Commitee, including the calling of a number of witnesses including Jack Messer, Laurie Portigal, etc., concerning the affairs leading to the botched sale of Channel Lake Petroleum and the subsequent dismissal (with $300k severance) granted to Jack Messer, a NDP political appointment?

It was front-page news in Saskatchewan in 1998/99 and the words, "Channel Lake" will yield a lot of hits on www.legassembly.sk.ca/Hansard . And if you search Google (or your favourite search engine) for the old Saskatchewan Party website, you will see many press releases.

Also, in 1998, there was another scandal at SaskPower that figured into the election, concerning the locking out of utility workers, and then actually legislating them back to work. These were all election issues, and were some of the major reasons behind the NDP only winning a minority of members in 1999.

64.110.251.69 01:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Just a minor nit as well -- "Some New Democrats who were unhappy with the cautious government of Roy Romanow had left the party to form the New Green Alliance, an environmentalist party. This party failed to make a significant impact, winning only 1% of the popular vote, and no seats in the legislature." is loaded with POV. Politics (and all articles relating to it) intrinsically must contain at least some POV, so obviously a deletion isn't in order, but obviously caution must be exercised.

64.110.251.69 02:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply