Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28586222917258a

Jump to content

Talk:1991 Saskatchewan general election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ajraddatz in topic Tories vs PCs

Untitled

[edit]
  • .gov.sk.ca shouldn't be viewed as a credible source with respect to political opinion, as *.gov.sk.ca is controlled by the NDP-controlled Government of Saskatchewan. I have, once again, removed the blatent POV in the article.

70.73.4.197 13:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add in the unpopular harmonization of the PST with the GST, and its questionable legality (since it was announced and implemented prior to legislation being tabled in the Legislative Assembly), if you want to add more to this article.

You might also want to add details concerning the problems that occurred within the tory caucus at the time, including, inter alia, the sudden resignation of Grant Hodgins.

70.73.4.197 22:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tories vs PCs

[edit]

Hello (particularly @Jwkozak91:), I am wondering about the inclusion of the link to Tory (disambiguation) in the lead of this article. IMO, it would be better to link to a specific page than to the disambiguation, or at least provide more context than is currently there with the link. There isn't anything wrong with using the word Tory per-se, considering the wide-spread popular use of the term to describe the Cons or provincial PCs, but in absence of a better link I think just saying "Progressive Conservatives" might make more sense. Obviously not a big deal, but my earlier change was reverted so I wanted to know what the rationale was for it. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:22, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply