Talk:1965
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1965 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Format
[edit]26-June-2007: The years 1900-1999 have a condensed Table of Contents since 28May07. See Talk:1950#Format (and "Talk:1950#Condensed TOC"). -Wikid77 22:05 26-June-2007
2004 page layout years
[edit]There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout.
For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).
Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.
Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). talk--BozMo 14:06, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
She was born this year, and she married into the title, but "future Countess of Wessex" makes it look as though she is not currently Countss of Wessex, only slated to become. Is there an lternate wording? Maybe "after Countess of Wessex" or something like that?
Births and deaths
[edit]What happened with this yea article? Someone need to recover births and deaths.
Dorothy Dandridge's death is an event?
[edit]Why? She's already under "deaths"
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
.jpg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
8 of the 9 images on this article are mainly related to the USA
[edit]Surely we can do better?
22:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC) Swampycow (talk) 22:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2026 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:36, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2101 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2300 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:10, 13 December 2025 (UTC)