Talk:1951 in spaceflight

Spaceflight: Timeline of spaceflight High‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the timeline of spaceflight working group.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1951 in spaceflight is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on March 6, 2023.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 23, 2021	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Please :)

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We need to add the flags. Mickman1234 (talk) 06:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

LSP vs. Operator

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is the right way to document this?

For example, let's look at a launch of Aerobee RTV-A-1 from Holloman AFB. It's a US Air Force base, I believe operated by the ARDC (Air Research and Development Command) at the time, but I don't know if they control the whole base or just have a presence there. It's a major command of the air force. Who is the LSP? The "US Air Force" or "ARDC"? Who is the Operator? If a university is involved in the payload research, are they the sole operator?

A similar question could be asked about the launches done by the US Army / US Army Signal Corps.

--Ibemichael (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good question. Using 2009 in spaceflight as my guide, it seems whomever provides the rockets is the LSP. The operator is the agency on whose behalf the rocket is launched. So Mitsubishi provides the rockets for JAXA. ARDC might have run the base, but the Air Force contracted the rocket so they'd be the LSP, I think. The Operator would be the builders of the payload/the engineers getting test data. --Neopeius (talk)

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:1951 in spaceflight

Please :)

LSP vs. Operator