Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a253f3727cdc2a7e

Jump to content

Talk:1922 conclave

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

Untitled

[edit]

All this "liberal" and "conservative" language is unhelpful. Leo XIII and Benedict XV were hardly liberals - their devotion, doctrine, language, culture was all traditional, and they certainly would not recognise modern "liberal Catholicism." I recognise there were differences between them and St. Pius X, but I would suggest these differences were more concerned with diplomatic policy (e.g. relations with republican France) than with doctrine. But when you use "liberal/conservative" language, you immediately conjure up to modern readers the post-60s Church in which doctrinal liberalism is present within the hierarchy. The language is misleading.

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2025 papal conclave which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RMCD bot 17:18, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply