Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a275b6717e878a31

Jump to content

Talk:1914 fleet review

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Dumelow in topic GA review

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:01, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Postcard depicting the 1914 fleet review
Postcard depicting the 1914 fleet review
  • ... that more than 200 British warships assembled for a fleet review (pictured) just days before the start of the First World War?
  • Source: "At the great review of the British fleet in July, 1914, two hundred and sixteen ships of war were in line" from: The History of Nations: Revision Service. P. F. Collier & son. 1920. p. 140. The review was on 20 July, Britain joined the war on 4 August. Happy to go with "two weeks before", if that's better
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 933 past nominations.

Dumelow (talk) 16:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC).Reply

GA review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:1914 fleet review/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Dumelow (talk · contribs) 08:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:43, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:43, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • Images appropriately licensed
  • Link First Lord of the Admiralty
Done - Dumelow (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • Tell the reader what type of ship Lance is
Done - Dumelow (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • Post-Dreadnought battleships is a usage I've never heard before. They're commonly referred to as dreadnoughts or dreadnought battleships, no capitalization. And the same for pre-dreadnoughts
Fixed, thanks - Dumelow (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • Air ships No. 4, 18 and 19 weren't Asta-Torres designs
Trimmed to just "airships"
  • Be careful of using page numbers for .epub versions because they reset with every resizing of the screen. My hard copy of cite 6 gives that information on page 53.
Thank you, fixed - Dumelow (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
No, the Hobbs book, not the Smith book.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:51, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Doh! I think I must have confused myself with the similar titles. Now fixed, hopefully! - Dumelow (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, I have edited the article per my comments above - Dumelow (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply