Talk:1866

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 22 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have made some year layout proposals which would affect this page: the year in topic paragraph would be replaced with a see also box.

If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 19:03, 6 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)Reply

What's up with the April 14th entry?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What's the point in the April 14th entry for this year? None of the people mentioned in the entry have a link. Why are any of these people important? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkieAA (talk • contribs) 17:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:1866

[Untitled]

What's up with the April 14th entry?