Talk:1740 conclave

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1740 conclave article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from 1740 conclave appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 January 2011. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Conclave of 1740 elected Benedict XIV after he advised them "If you wish to elect a saint, choose Gotti; a statesman, Aldrovandi; an honest man, me"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2011/January.

Wikipedia

Roman Curia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roman Curia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Roman CuriaWikipedia:WikiProject Roman CuriaTemplate:WikiProject Roman CuriaRoman Curia

European Microstates: Vatican City

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Vatican City portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as High-importance).

Catholicism Mid‑importance

1740 conclave is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page); Kazimieras Vasiliauskas (monsignor)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

On 8 June 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from 1740 papal conclave to 1740 conclave. The result of the discussion was moved.

Supposed veto

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Was Spain's veto deployed against Corradini? The source for this is an unsourced comment in Miranda (http://www2.fiu.edu/~mirandas/conclave-xviii.htm#1740). Another self-published scholar (Adams, here) says this isn't correct, that there was jockeying to get Spain to use its veto against Corradini, but it was never used. (Note that Corradini was 82 and never a realistic candidate.) Adams' reading is based on an extremely thorough account of diplomatic/international intrigues at the 1740 conclave: Petruccelli della Gattina, Histoire diplomatique des conclaves (1866, A. Lacrois, Verboeckhoven & Co., Brussels) page 108ff. I've removed the veto from this entry. Looks like just another Miranda mistake and Petruccelli is authoritative. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 21:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

This veto is also not mentioned here, in what appears to be a rather learned article from 1877 full of good leads on other conclaves and legal background. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 21:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2025 papal conclave which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:1740 conclave

Supposed veto

Move discussion in progress