Talk:161 Maiden Lane

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 08:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that after a lawsuit, the developer of the One Seaport building had to begin advertising it as 1 Seaport instead? Source: "Seaport dispute settled". Real Estate Weekly. December 22, 2015.
  • ALT1: ... that after a lawsuit, the developer of the One Seaport building had to advertise it as 1 Seaport? Source: "Seaport dispute settled". Real Estate Weekly. December 22, 2015.
  • ALT2: ... that to attract tenants, the developers of 161 Maiden Lane offered luxury yachts? Source: Rosenberg, Zoe (October 7, 2016). "Seaport condo offers up the next over-the-top amenity: yacht rentals". Curbed NY.
  • ALT3: ... that after 161 Maiden Lane began leaning 3 inches (76 mm), its contractor had a hard time installing a curtain wall and filed a lawsuit? Source: Baird-Remba, Rebecca (April 2, 2019). "Contractor Sues Fortis Over 'Unsafe' Leaning Condo Tower Near Seaport". Commercial Observer.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Panzer Dragoon II Zwei
  • Comment: I (Epicgenius) may add more hooks later.

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk) and Mmberney (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 13:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/161 Maiden Lane; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - something in there.

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @Epicgenius and Mmberney: Good article though, it does seem like earwig is detecting a slight bit of paraphrasing that i'd like to be fixed. waiting on a qpq Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke: Thanks for the review. I have now done a QPQ and reworded the text in question. Epicgenius (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Better. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)