Talk:005
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 005 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "005" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
 | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was soft delete. |
Dead link
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.popularplay.com/a/61/005-from-Sega-.php
- In History of video games on 2011-04-01 02:16:21, 404 Not Found
- In History of video games on 2011-04-01 21:43:10, 404 Not Found
- In 005 on 2011-05-20 22:34:14, 404 Not Found
Dead link 2
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
The Encyclopedia of Arcade Video Games
[edit]- Kurtz, Bill (2007). "The Encyclopedia of Arcade Video Games". Schiffer Book for Collectors. Schiffer Publishing. 005; p. 211. ISBN 978-07-643-1925-9.
- The above reference may aid in expanding and referencing this article if anyone has access to it. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 23:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Improvement since deletion discussion
[edit]@Anarchyte, Alexandra IDV, GiovanniSidwell, and Hellknowz: Pinging participants of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/005. I have improved this page about as much as I am able to at this time; It has ~ twice as many sources as it did before, and the new ones may be of a bit better quality. I believe the subject is notable because it was one of the first stealth games and, to a lesser degree, as one of Sega's first games within the RasterScan Convert-a-Game series. Any objection to re-publishing (i.e. a move back to the mainspace)? — Godsy (TALKCONT) 00:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- I have no objections to this article being reinstated. The red image link should be fixed before that happens though. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 20 May 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move the pages as proposed at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:29, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
– This is clearly the primary topic. The only other linked article at the dab page that conatins "005", "O05", "0O5", or "OO5" in its title is Lufthansa Flight 005, but that is a WP:PTM. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. bd2412 T 03:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support - I considered such a move at the time I reintroduced the arcade game article into the mainspace but never took the leap. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose 005 in the James Bond books is obscure, but this arcade game from 1981 even more so. Leave as a dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:31, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support. Readers and editors unlikely to get tripped up here. Dohn joe (talk) 13:07, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support. This is the only topic of this exact name. Readers are not likely to confuse it with anything else.--Cúchullain t/c 17:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support Only topic with this title. Those who may somehow end up here from a mistaken search can easily get to the DAB page with the hatnote.--Yaksar (let's chat) 22:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. Negative benefit to readers and editors alike, but mainly to editors so providing there's a for hatnote on the video game article no great damage I guess. Andrewa (talk) 19:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support. I there is no other article that has more right to the 005 page name and the article does not need to have 'video game' in the title. Dreamy Jazz (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.