Talk:...Is It Something I Said?
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]I listened to this album the other day. I find it amazing that this album came out in the 70's but still seems fresh and funny, especialy to me who was born after this album was already about 15 years old.
BUT: Could someone explain why this album only got a 3 star review on AMG. I read the album review and nothing negative was mentioned so I wondered why this album recieved an average rating? There is nothing average about this album. Anyone else outraged like me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.208.243.84 (talk) 20:01, August 21, 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Pryor something.jpg
[edit]
Image:Pryor something.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
