Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a40399867c3e6069

Jump to content

Operculum (fish)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Subopercle)
Opercular series in bony fish: operculum (yellow), preoperculum (red), interoperculum (green) and suboperculum (pink)

The operculum is a series of bones found in osteichthyes and chimaeras that serves as a facial support structure and a protective covering for the gills; it is also used for respiration and feeding.[1]

Anatomy

[edit]

The opercular series contains four bone segments known as the preoperculum (or preopercle, preoperular), suboperculum (or subopercle, subopercular), interoperculum (or interopercle, interopercular) and operculum (or opercle, opercular).[2]

The preoperculum is a crescent-shaped structure that has a series of ridges directed posterodorsally to the organism’s canal pores. The preoperculum can be located through an exposed condyle that is present immediately under its ventral margin; it also borders the operculum, suboperculum, and interoperculum posteriorly.

The suboperculum is rectangular in shape in most bony fish and is located ventral to the preoperculum and operculum components. It is the thinnest bone segment out of the opercular series and is located directly above the gills.

The interoperculum is triangular shaped and borders the suboperculum posterodorsally and the preoperculum anterodorsally. This bone is also known to be short on the dorsal and ventral surrounding borders.[3]

The bones of the opercular series ossify intramembranously; as such, they are part of the dermatocranium.[4]

Evolution

[edit]

The opercule is thought to have originated from the submarginal plate of placoderms.[5]

The preopercle is thought to be a neomorph present only in osteichthyes. Among osteolepiforms (a paraphyletic group that gave rise to tetrapods), the preopercle is thought to have divided into the preopercle, the quadratojugal, and the squamosal.[6]

The operculum as a structure, as well as most of its bones, were lost in the early evolution of tetrapods. This separated the head from the shoulder girdle, allowing for the evolution of a distinct mobile neck. A vestigial preopercle remained at the rear of the skull of the early tetrapods Ichthyostega and Acanthostega, but this was lost in later tetrapods.[6] The subopercle is lost in the clade Neotetrapoda.[7]

An element known as the batrachian operculum is present in the middle ear of some amphibians.[8] Once considered to be homologous with the operculum of fishes, it is now considered to have a separate origin.[9][8]

Development

[edit]
Operculum of a European perch

During development the opercular series is known to be one of the first bone structures to form. In the three-spined stickleback the opercular series is seen forming at around seven days after fertilization. Within hours the formation of the shape is visible and then the individual components are developed days later. The size and shape of the operculum bone is dependent on the organism's location. For example, fresh water threespine sticklebacks form a less dense and smaller opercular series in relation to marine threespine sticklebacks. The marine threespine stickleback exhibits a larger and thicker opercular series. This provides evidence that there was an evolutionary change in the operculum bone. The thicker and more dense bone may have been favored due to selective pressures exerted from the threespine stickleback's environment. The development of the operculuar series has changed dramatically over time. The fossil record of the threespine stickleback provide the ancestral shapes of the operculum bone. Overall, the operculum bone became more triangular in shape and thicker in size over time.[3]

Genes that are essential in the development of the opercular series include the Eda and Pitx1 genes. These genes are known to be a part of the development and loss of armor plates in gnathostomes. The Endothelin1 pathway is thought to be associated with the development of the operculum bone since it regulates dorsal-ventral patterning of the hyomandibular region. Mutations in the Edn1-pathway in zebrafish are known to lead to deformities of the opercular series' shape and size.[3]

The opercular series is vital in obtaining oxygen. They open as the mouth closes, causing the pressure inside the fish to drop. Water then flows towards the lower pressure across the fish's gill lamellae, allowing some oxygen to be absorbed from the water. Cartilaginous ratfishes (chimaeras) possess soft and flexible opercular flaps. Sharks, rays and relatives among elasmobranch fishes lack the opercular series. They instead respire through a series of gill slits that perforate the body wall. Without the operculum bone, other methods of getting water to the gills are required, such as ram ventilation, as used by many sharks.

Morphology of the operculum is frequently utilised in age determination of actinopterygian fishes.[10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Charles B. Kimmel; Windsor E. Aguirre; Bonnie Ullmann; Mark Currey; William A. Cresko (2008). "Allometric change accompanies opercular shape evolution in Alaskan threespine sticklebacks" (PDF). Behaviour. 145 (4/5): 669–691. Bibcode:2008Behav.145..669C. doi:10.1163/156853908792451395. JSTOR 40295944.
  2. Keivany, Yazdan (2014). "Comparative osteology of the suspensorial and opercular series in representatives of the eurypterygian fishes". Iranian Journal of Ichthyology. 1 (2): 73–90. doi:10.22034/iji.v1i2.16.
  3. 1 2 3 Lane, Jennifer A.; Ebert, Martin (2012). "Revision of Furo muensteri (Halecomorphi, Ophiopsidae) from the Upper Jurassic of Western Europe, with comments on the genus". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 32 (4): 799–819. Bibcode:2012JVPal..32..799L. doi:10.1080/02724634.2012.680325. S2CID 85009477.
  4. Beraldo, Paola; Pinosa, Maurizio; Tibaldi, Emilio; Canavese, Bartolomeo (2003-04-14). "Abnormalities of the operculum in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): morphological description". Aquaculture. 220 (1): 89–99. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00416-7. ISSN 0044-8486.
  5. Zhu, Min; Yu, Xiaobo; Ahlberg, Per Erik; Choo, Brian; Lu, Jing; Qiao, Tuo; Qu, Qingming; Zhao, Wenjin; Jia, Liantao; Blom, Henning; Zhu, You’an (2013). "A Silurian placoderm with osteichthyan-like marginal jaw bones". Nature. 502 (7470). Nature Publishing Group: 188–193. doi:10.1038/nature12617. ISSN 1476-4687.
  6. 1 2 Gai, Zhikun; Yu, Xiaobo; Zhu, Min (2017). "The Evolution of the Zygomatic Bone From Agnatha to Tetrapoda". The Anatomical Record. 300 (1): 16–29. doi:10.1002/ar.23512. ISSN 1932-8494.
  7. "3. Description and Systematics of Panderichthyid Fishes with Comments on Their Relationship to Tetrapods", Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods, Cornell University Press, pp. 68–109, 2018-12-31, doi:10.7591/9781501718335-005, retrieved 2026-09-17
  8. 1 2 Schoch, Rainer R.; Anderson, Jason S. (2016), Clack, Jennifer A.; Fay, Richard R; Popper, Arthur N. (eds.), "Amphibia: A Case of Diversity and Convergence in the Auditory Region", Evolution of the Vertebrate Ear : Evidence from the Fossil Record, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 327–355, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46661-3_11, ISBN 978-3-319-46661-3, retrieved 2026-09-15{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  9. Sokol, Otto M. (1975). "The Phylogeny of Anuran Larvae: A New Look". Copeia. 1975 (1). [American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH), Allen Press]: 1–23. doi:10.2307/1442399. ISSN 0045-8511.
  10. Perry, Robert C.; Casselman, John M. (2012-08-01). "Comparisons of Precision and Bias with Two Age Interpretation Techniques for Opercular Bones of Longnose Sucker, a Long-Lived Northern Fish". North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 32 (4): 790–795. doi:10.1080/02755947.2012.685143. ISSN 0275-5947.