Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24f7d784d5f89da

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did subduction erosion say to the plate? You're always taking me down.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tectonic erosion or subduction erosion is the loss of crust from an overriding tectonic plate due to subduction.[1] Two types of tectonic erosion exist: frontal erosion at the outer margin of a plate and basal erosion at the base of the plate's crust.[1] Basal erosion causes a thinning of the overriding plate.[2] When frontal tectonic erosion consumes a crustal block at the outer margin it may induce a domino effect on upper crustal tectonics causing the remaining blocks to fault and tilt to fill the “gap” left by the consumed block.[2] Subduction erosion is believed to be enhanced by high convergence rates and low sediment supply to the trench.[1]

Before the Neoproterozoic, subduction erosion rates were probably higher than at present due to higher convergence rates. A scarcity of blueschists from this time seems to support this view.[1] However, this assertion is arguably wrong because the earliest oceanic crust would have contained more magnesium than today's crust and, therefore, would have formed greenschist-like rocks at blueschist facies.[3]

The following features and processes have been associated with subduction erosion:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 4 Stern, Charles R. (2011). "Subduction erosion: Rates, mechanisms, and its role in arc magmatism and the evolution of the continental crust and mantle". Gondwana Research. 20 (2–3): 284–308. Bibcode:2011GondR..20..284S. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2011.03.006.
  2. 1 2 3 Niemeyer, Hans; González, Gabriel; Martínez-De Los Ríos, Edmundo (1996). "Evolución tectónica cenozoica del margen continental activo de Antofagasta, norte de Chile". Revista Geológica de Chile (in Spanish). 23 (2): 165–186.
  3. Palin, Richard M.; White, Richard W. (2016). "Emergence of blueschists on Earth linked to secular changes in oceanic crust composition". Nature Geoscience. 9 (1): 60–64. Bibcode:2016NatGe...9...60P. doi:10.1038/ngeo2605. S2CID 130847333.
  4. Encinas, Alfonso; Finger, Kenneth L.; Buatois, Luis A.; Peterson, Dawn E. (2012). "Major forearc subsidence and deep-marine Miocene sedimentation in the present Coastal Cordillera and Longitudinal Depression of south-central Chile (38°30'S – 41°45'S)". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 124 (7–8): 1262–1277. doi:10.1130/b30567.1. hdl:10533/135235.
  5. Encinas, Alfonso; Pérez, Felipe; Nielsen, Sven N.; Finger, Kenneth L.; Valencia, Victor; Duhart, Paul (2014). "Geochronologic and paleontologic evidence for a Pacific–Atlantic connection during the late Oligocene–early Miocene in the Patagonian Andes (43–44°S)". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 55: 1–18. Bibcode:2014JSAES..55....1E. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2014.06.008. hdl:10533/130517.
  6. Charrier, Reynaldo; Pinto, Luisa; Rodríguez, María Pía (2006). "3. Tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Andean Orogen in Chile". In Moreno, Teresa; Gibbons, Wes (eds.). Geology of Chile. Geological Society of London. pp. 21, 45–46. ISBN 9781862392199.