Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a46002b39c0acf4a

Jump to content

Strong set order

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In order theory, the strong set order is a partial order over the subsets of a lattice. It is widely used to study monotone comparative statics of parametrized optimization problems in economic theory and operations research.[1]

The strong set order was first defined and used by Arthur F. Veinott in his unpublished lecture notes.[2][3][4] It was later popularized by Donald M. Topkis, Paul Milgrom and Chris Shannon via their work on monotone comparative statics, in particular through Topkis' Theorem.

Definition

[edit]

Given a lattice , consider its power set . The strong set order is a partial order on given by:

where and are respectively the join and meet of .

Examples and non-examples

[edit]

Real numbers

[edit]

Consider the real numbers with the usual order . Let and . Then

.

More generally, for any , we have

.

Euclidean space

[edit]

Consider the Euclidean space with the usual pointwise order: . For , let

Then :. But now consider

;

Then , since , but

.

Power set

[edit]

Consider the power set of the natural numbers under the set-inclusion order: . Let

,
.

It it not true that . Indeed, we have , , but

whence .

Applications

[edit]

Topkis' Theorem

[edit]

The strong set order is widely used in monotone comparative statics, in particular via Topkis' Theorem. Given a lattice , a poset , a constraint correspondence and a function , the theorem gives sufficient conditions for the correspondence

the be increasing in the strong set order, that is, for the statement

to hold.

Monotone selections

[edit]

Increasigness in the strong set order can be used to obtain monotone selections from correspondences. Indeed, if is a poset and is a lattice, the correspondence is nonempty-valued and increasing in the strong set order, then a monotone selection from exists if any of the following hold:

  • has a minimal element for every (in particular, if is complete-lattice-valued). One can thus take : by putting . The same works if a maximal element is available.
  • is a sublattice of a finite product of chains.[5] This covers, for example, .
  • is countable.[5]

Zhou's Fixed-Point Theorem for correspondences

[edit]

The strong set order can also be used for a generalization of Tarski's fixed-point theorem to correspondences known as Zhou's fixed-point theorem:[6][7]

Theorem: let be a nonempty complete lattice and a nonempty-valued correspondence. If is increasing in the strong set order and is a subcomplete sublattice for all , then has a fixed point. Moreover, the set of such fixed points is a complete lattice.

Weak set order

[edit]

The strong set order if often too restrictive for some applications, in particular because it assumes that the underlying space is a lattice.[8] A useful weaker ordering which can be used on the subsets of any poset is the weak set order , defined by:[1]

This order can moreover be broken down into two weaker orders: the upper and lower weak set orders , respectively defined by:

Clearly .

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Topkis, Donald M. (1998). Supermodularity and Complementarity. Princeton University Press. p. 32. ISBN 9780691032443.
  2. ↑ Topkis, Donald M. (1978). "Minimizing a Submodular Function on a Lattice". Operations Research. 26 (2): 305–321. doi:10.1287/opre.26.2.305. JSTOR 169636. Veinott (personal communication) introduced this relation.
  3. ↑ Milgrom, Paul; Chris, Shannon (1994). "Monotone Comparative Statics". Econometrica. 62 (1): 157–180. doi:10.2307/2951479. JSTOR 2951479. (...) the strong set order , introduced by Veinott (1989).
  4. ↑ Veinott, Arthur F. (1989). "Lattice Programming". Unpublished Notes from Lectures Delivered at Johns Hopkins University.
  5. 1 2 Kukushikin, Nikolai S. (2013). "Increasing Selections from Increasing Multifunctions". Order. 30 (2): 541–555. doi:10.1007/s11083-012-9260-6.
  6. ↑ Lin, Zhou (1994). "The Set of Nash Equilibria of a Supermodular Game Is a Complete Lattice". Games and Economic Behavior. 7 (2): 295–300. doi:10.1006/game.1994.1051.
  7. ↑ Yu, Lu (2026). "Fixed point theorems for increasing correspondences on lattices". Economic Theory. 68: 1–19. doi:10.1007/s00199-026-01702-7.
  8. ↑ Che, Yeon-Koo; Kim, Jinwoo; Kojima, Fuhito (2021). "Weak Monotone Comparative Statics". pp. 2–3. arXiv:1911.06442v4 [econ.TH].