// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Simple Learning Design 2.0 say to its date? You upgrade my life.

Simple Learning Design 2.0 (SLD 2.0) is a learning design specification proposed by Durand and Downes from the National Research Council of Canada in 2009.^[1] It was intended as an interoperability specification, simpler to implement than IMS Learning Design, a specification as of 2010 restricted only to pilot and research projects.^[2] IMS Learning Design is a specification for describing methods of learning design, in a way that claims to be pedagogically neutral. Simple Learning Design 2.0 was designed to be implemented by developers in a commercial e-learning application,^{[citation needed]}^[3]^[4] and was intended to be paired with a more complex specification, described as "a real UML for learning design."^[2] The intent behind SLD 2.0 was to propose a specification with a good balance between its expressivity and the simplicity of its implementation.^[5]

References

↑ Durand, G., Downes, S.: Toward Simple Learning Design 2.0. In: 4th Int. Conf. on Computer Science & Education 2009, Nanning, China, pp. 894-897, 2009.
1 2 Derntl, Michael; Neumann, Susanne; Griffiths, Dai; Oberhuemer, Petra (2010). "Investigating Teachers' Understanding of IMS Learning Design: Yes They Can!". In Wolpers, Martin; Kirschner, Paul A.; Scheffel, Maren; Lindstaedt, Stefanie; Dimitrova, Vania (eds.). Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6383. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 62–77. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_5. ISBN 978-3-642-16020-2.
↑ Durand, Guillaume; Belliveau, Luc; Craig, Benjamin (2010). Simple Learning Design 2.0. pp. 549–551. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2010.156. ISBN 978-1-4244-7144-7.
↑ "Simple Learning Design 2.0". ResearchGate. August 2010.
↑ Durand G., Belliveau L., Craig B., "Simple Learning Design 2.0, icalt, pp.549-551, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2010.

[1] Durand, G., Downes, S.: Toward Simple Learning Design 2.0. In: 4th Int. Conf. on Computer Science & Education 2009, Nanning, China, pp. 894-897, 2009.

[:0-2] 1 2 Derntl, Michael; Neumann, Susanne; Griffiths, Dai; Oberhuemer, Petra (2010). "Investigating Teachers' Understanding of IMS Learning Design: Yes They Can!". In Wolpers, Martin; Kirschner, Paul A.; Scheffel, Maren; Lindstaedt, Stefanie; Dimitrova, Vania (eds.). Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6383. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 62–77. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_5. ISBN 978-3-642-16020-2.

[3] Durand, Guillaume; Belliveau, Luc; Craig, Benjamin (2010). Simple Learning Design 2.0. pp. 549–551. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2010.156. ISBN 978-1-4244-7144-7.

[4] "Simple Learning Design 2.0". ResearchGate. August 2010.

[5] Durand G., Belliveau L., Craig B., "Simple Learning Design 2.0, icalt, pp.549-551, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2010.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Simple Learning Design 2.0 say to its date? You upgrade my life.

References