// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Rutgersella say to its date? "You're a shell of a good time.
| Rutgersella Temporal range: | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Rutgersella truexi from the Early Silurian Shawangunk Formation of Delaware Water Gap, Pennsylvania | |
Scientific classification  | |
| Domain: | incertae sedis |
| Genus: | †Rutgersella Johnson and Fox 1968[1] |
| Species | |
| |
Rutgersella truexi is a form species for problematic fossils of Early Silurian age in Pennsylvania. It has been of special interest because of its morphological similarity with the iconic Ediacaran fossil Dickinsonia, and may have been a late surviving vendobiont.[2]
Description
[edit]Rutgersella truexi is a flat, segmented fossil, with both radial and bilateral symmetry like Dickinsonia, but with a shorter midline. The fossils are pyritized; some internal chambers are filled with chalcedony, so that they are preserved along with proposed "basal rhizines".
Controversially, according to Retallack, these observations suggest affinities with lichens, and perhaps the fungal phylum Glomeromycota,[2] a statement not currently supported by more verifiable palaeontologists.[3]
Gallery
[edit]
Petrographic thin section of Rutgersella truexi from Early Silurian Shawangunk Formation of Pennsylvania
References
[edit]- ↑ Johnson, H.; Fox, S. K., Jr. (1968). "Dipleurozoa from Lower Silurian of North America". Science. 162 (3849): 119–120. doi:10.1126/science.162.3849.119.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - 1 2 Retallack, G.J. (2015). "Reassessment of the problematic fossil Rutgersella as another post-Ediacaran vendobiont". Alcheringa. 39 (4): 573–588. doi:10.1080/03115518.2015.1069483. S2CID 54780312.
- ↑ Runnegar, B. (2021). "Following the logic behind biological interpretations of the Ediacaran biotas". Geological Magazine. 159 (4): 1–25. doi:10.1017/S0016756821000443. S2CID 237757573.