Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28488dba848891a

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhy did "rights upon future offers" go to therapy? It had a lot of pending issues.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A rights upon future offers (RUFO) clause is a clause used in certain contracts, in which a party who has agreed to contractual terms, gains certain rights if other parties in future obtain better or different terms.[citation needed] Such clauses may be used to induce a party to be more willing to accept contractual terms, in the knowledge that if better terms are offered to someone else in future, the same improved terms will also be applied retrospectively to all existing parties as well.[1]

An example of the potential dangers of such clauses, if not considered carefully, arose during the Argentine debt restructuring of 2005–2014. In this case 93% of bondholders accepted a reduced settlement while 7% refused and went on to win a lawsuit entitling them to full settlement. Argentina declared itself unable to pay either, despite having the money to do so, since the settlement of a better offer with the small number of holdout creditors would, it feared, trigger a RUFO clause and cause the remaining 93% to be entitled to receive their payment in full as well, which the country could not afford.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 "Argentina accuses US of judicial malpractice for triggering needless default". 31 July 2014.